Report On The Petition Concerning The Failure By Kenya Breweries Limited, Kaplan & Stratton Advocate And Harrison Kinyanjui Advo

O o a a o o a Panltaf"f OF KEN ENT YA L I E RAF.I' t_ Hennrsoru Knwaryur & CO. ADVOCATES I. Harrison Kinvaniui LI.B (NBo) Dip. In taw (KSL) r.. rara roraf g err( tueJ (FORMERLY MITCHEl-L COTTS HOUSE) arr-rrr-oo\surB4.ro ./ WABERA P.O. BOX r OO24 G I CELL: 0734-733 o JHK/D}.,4/3005/2012 sEN/ DrSSC/ SCT-SW / 202s / 45 Our Ref: Your Ref APRIL 8TH,2025 Date: MR.IEREMIAH NYEGENYE CLERK OF THE SENATE SENATE OF KENYA NAIROBI Email: clerk.senate@pal"liament.so.ke Tel: 2848000 Dear Sir,/Madam, RE: UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS BY UNSPECIFIED PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF CLAIM AGAINST KENYA BRE TERIES LIMITED, KAPLAN & STRAT'TON ADVOCATES & HARRISON KINYANIUI ADVOCATE We refer to the abozte and express deep shock at the manner in which the abooe matter has come to our attention on tlis Apil 8th, 2025 uthen ttte haae NEVER been seraed with ANY Petition, Ittter, or etten Summons from your esteemed Ofice to proffer our rejoinder. At about 7.20p.m on this Apil $tr,, 2025 some members of the media contacted Mr. Harrison Kinyanjui on a proceeding in respect of the aboz,e matter, before the Labour Committee ruhen Mr. Harrison Kinyanjui Adoocate's name and lau firm urere adaersely mentioned, ns they utere seeking to hatre our comments on the same. Mr. Kinyanjui utas utterly stunned, as there utas NO notice of any such allegations sented on us to respond to at any gioen time. Please note the follouting: a) Our email address is gtgatlryrcpn@trthoo.conr It is oficially on all our documents including tle Lau Society of Kenya website. NO email of ANY communication, Petition, Summons, or eten notice of such a Parliamentary Petition has been emailed to us in that regnrd. - (')/nr" ?lV,?s,g t, tla . .,/6,1(T Vi* a,t ,u,, (tAfo.,n" 1 o o TEL:777-733659 FAx:254-2-342071 email: greatharrison@Jzahoo.com O

o O o a a a o a b) Our Post Offia address is P.O. BOX 10024-00100 GPO NAIROBI. NO mail in respect of the abooe subject has been POSTED (by ordinary or registered mail) to us. We do NOT lwoe ANY other Postal Address. c) Our Offce is on 4th Floor, St. Ellis House, Wabera Street, Nairobi and NO hard copy of ANY letter, or ANY Petition or Summons from the Senate has been delioered to us on the aboae matter. We do not hnoe any other ffice for receipt of documents. d) Mr. Harrison Kinyanjui's phone numbers are as oficially indicated on the Laur Society of Kenya urebsite, and ure haae NOT had ANY telephone call or ANY lNhatsApp Messenger communication in respect of the referenced issue for us to attend or respond. Please note that accordingly, ute nre in total dnrkness as to WHAT thc issue is before the Senate, or in INHAT manner our rejoinder utould be required and in respect of INHAT issue. Further note that the issue of Kenya Breweies Ltd compensating its former employees is pending before the High Court as SOME indittiduals seek to set aside the Judgement of Hon. lustice Sergon in NAIROBI HCC 2792.003 in which some persons haae hitherto made applications to hme the case leard afresh. The matter is therefo re sub iudice. (Please see attacheil Court CTS pintout of the same, for ailjudication of an application CURRENT as lodged by Namada €t Co. Adoocates representing some of the 6,000 Plaintffi). We also utish to bing to your kind attention the follotuing: 1. The fact is that there zpere alleged to be about 6,000 or so former employees of Kenya Breuteies subject of the said suit, some reprexnted by Gitobu Imanyara €t Co. Adaocates, some by Namada €t Co. Adoocates, and some by O.P. Ngoge €t Co. Adaocates in the pimary suit, NAIROBI HCC 279 of 2003. Some of the said Plaintffi left Gitobu Imanyara €t Co. Afutocates and sought representation from my law firm. They were in penury and I ffired to act for ONLY identifable Plaintffi from IvVS Gitobu lmanyara Adoocate. 2. About 125 of the said indioiduals approached my laur firm through the '[.'t-named Plaintiff, one Lautrence Nduttu to so reprexnt them in the cited suit. O.P. Ngoge €t Co. Adaocates were unhappy about this and when the matter utas called before Hon. Lady lustice Ang'auta she formally listed the said indiuiduals as being aligned under my lau' fm and those aligned und.er Namada €t Co. Aduocates separately. 3. Unhappy, O.P. Ngoge Adaocate sued my lau, fm as urell as Namada €t Co. Aduocates to appeal against a Ruling of the High Court dated 76th December, 2011 (Ang'awa, l) that hnd nllouted some parties joined in the suit as plaintiffs to be represented by the frm of lvl/s l. a o 2 a

a a o a a a o (t o 3 a t Harrison Kinyanjui €s Co. Aduocates, instead of W O.P. Ngoge €t Associates who were reprexnting all tlu plaintffi jointly. 4. NONE of the 12\Plaintiffs paid the cost of defending these proceedings. It was ALL at my outn cost, to secure justice for the said Plaintffi. 5. The Objection by O. P. Ngoge Adaocnte in the said proceedings was ooemtled by a 3 Judge Court of Appeal Bench of Hon. Mr. lustice Githinji, Warsame €t Musinga 01il by an Order dated 19tlt Nottember, 2013 in Nairobi Court of Aooeal Cfuil Application No. NAI 51 oL201-3. 7. Unl*ppy urith the Court of Appeal's decision against him, O. P. Ngoge Adaocate then lodged and Appeal in the Supreme Court. ztide Supreme Court Petition No. 13 of 201s My lau frm ans sued as the 3'd Re.spondent therein while the 4 in the Supreme C-ourt Appeal and the SAME parties I represent toere also sued and they entirely relied on my representation BEFORE the Supreme Court. 8. The Supreme Court DISMISSED the said appeal entirely by learned Counsel O.P. Ngoge. NONE of the 125 persons under Lautrence Nduttu paid my laut frm a SHILLING for that entire span of Supreme Court proceedings. To date. Can anyone allege that we "faileil to proaide anytladequate professional seruice" in this instance despite NO fee being remitted? 9. The stated decision of the Supreme Court uhich details the matter in extenso, including our representations before the Apex Court can be found here for aerifcation: Peter Odiwuor Nsose t/a O P Nsose €t Associates Adztocates €r 5379 others zt I Namada Simoni t/a Namada & Co Aduocates €t 725 others [2014] eKLR 70.1 appeared duing the entire Heaing of the High Court tial before the Hon. Mr. lustice Sergon, and they also did not remit the legal fee on the conclusion of the tial. No getting up fee of a shilling was remitted. 6. NONE of the said Plaintffi paid my ls71t f.rm a SHILLING to defend them in thc Court of Appeal in those proceedings. None of them could eaen lau,fully allege that u,e "failed to prooide any/adequate professional se'ruice" in this instance despite NO fee being remitted. 11. No one compelled ANY of the Claimants to execute the Discharge Vouchers which enabled payments of what they uere demnnding from Kenya Breweies. Mr. Larurence Nduttu zoas taslced by the Hon. Lady Jttstice Ang'arua with representing the Claimants hence Mr. Lautrence Nduttu by order of tlrc Court in tlu cited suit thus arranged for each of them to be

a a o a a o o o a 4 o o furnished urith a copy of their respectizte Discharge Voucher from Kenya Breuteies' adoocates on record lvUS. Kaplan I Strqtton Adaocates, nnd each of them executed the same. 12. Was ANY of tlrcm placed under the banel of a gun to execute the same, or tortured, or subjected to ANY form of duress of compulsion? Were ANY of them subjected to ANY form of coercion by myself or ANY employee in my law frm? NO!!!!! 13.They each ooluntaily and urithout any compulsion executed the same after being informed by Laavence Nduttu and myself of the contents and ramifications thereof. Their payments utere mode by bankers checks to EACH of tlum, collected by the persons indiaidually apart from one or two utho called our offce and categorically directed us to hnnd their cheque to Mr. Njigu or Mr. Lautrence Ndufu as the case was. This was also documented. 14. It was on the bases of these Discharge Vouchers that the pro-rated sums toere remitted to THEM. NONE of the said persons REIECTED the cheques, or euen receioed ANY of the cheques on a utithaut prejudice basis. 75. Notc that the indioiduals utere to receioe each according to their Discharge Voucher. As a Client binds an Adaocate to a commitment made urhich the Adaocate hns to abide by, these Discharge Vouchers are categoical and clear in their terms. Hout could toe be accused of ooerriding the same? 15. Each of the said persons under our reprexntation READ and UNDERSTOOD uthat the Discharge Vouchers stated BEFORE executing the same. 17. Mr. Laurrence Nduttu as indicated aboae was appointed by Order of the Hon. Iady lustice Ang'awa to sutear all depositions on behalf of the Plaintiffs under my laut frm and hence uthen he conoened the said persons and ALL mntters urere disclosed to the said persons NONE of them objected, or sought to be excluded, or othenuise remoaed themseloes from our representation. Hout then hnae ute failed to execute their uishes? '18. We then forutardcd each of the said duly executed Dischnrge Vouchers to Kaplan €s Stratton Adoocates by our letter dated June Sth, 2023. They cannot be heard to resile from tluir own commi tme n t s there in co ntaine d. 19. Note further that a Schedule of payments utas receiaed by *y law frm from Laurence Nduttu under a forurarding letter ftom an entity chistened "KEN-BREX SACCO GROUP" tohose signatory ttas Laurrence Nduttu as the ostensible chairperson. Tlw said communication utas indicating that I should pay ALL the 125 persons' remittances amounts to Equity Bnnk Ltd from my stated Client Account into which the dues had been mnde.

a a a o a a a o c 20.1 totally disagreed with that course of action as it ruas not only unlaurful but altogether fraudulent, and I immediately instructed Mr. Lawrence Nduttu to rectify the sums indicqted on the remittance Schedule should be to EACH of the 1.25 Plaintiffi I represent and I declined to remit any sums to the KEN-BREX SACCO GROUP stated Bank Account insisting thnt I uould pay each beneficiary through the Bankers Cheques. This is the genesis of ALL the malice by the said Mr. IAINRENCE NDUTU and a Mr. NfiGU. 21. Afier Mr. Lawrence Thoithi agreed to re-do the Schedule of payments he made an error in the fnal remittances so that he failed to factor into the schedule the bank charges of Ksh.300/= per Bankers Cheque as well as the Ksh.600,000/- to be retained in the said Client Account to cooer for the expenxs of tlu pending Appeal. This fact was knoun to l-awrence Nduttu and all the other Claimants I represented in the said Mntter. 22. To date, no one has utitten to my lnut firm (NOT euen Lautrence Nduttu) to complain that I haae in any manner misappropiated a penny of their funds. 23. It is important that I state that each of the returned Banl<er's Cheques utith the elroneous sums and of tuhich Lautrence Nduttu (as the lead person) had misspelt names attracted a fee of Ksh. 300/= drawn from the same Account. 24. I urish to state that payments agreeable to all the former employees of KBL whom I represented, were paid through Bankers Cheques. I must also state that I still hold in my posxssion some Bankers' Cheques drawn in the name of former KBL employees whom I was reprcsenting that are since demised, awaiting Grant of lttters of Representation which Lawrence Nduttu is fully aware of. 25.1haae NOT (I repeat: NOT) retained a SHILLING or any amount of the monies remitted to my stated Clients Account by IvUS Kaplan €t Stratton in respect of the settlement done under the stated ludgement, relating to this matter as I had the specifc Bankers Cheques drawn infaaor ofeachbeneficiary according to the listftom KBL Adaocates as cross chccked and aeifed by Lautrence Nduttu utith my Accountant Mr. Laurrence Thoithi. None of the persons on the list of the 125 Plaintiffs I represented hat-te claimed (formally or otherwise) that I haoe not paid any amounts to them under the said settlement. 26. I refer you kindly to paragraph 19 and 20 abooe to comprelund the context of the bitter allegations herein raised by the said persons. Surely, it is unfair that we should be dqiaed of the opportunity to demonstrate the sheer malice by this Lautrence Nduttu. 27. By our Letter dated {trt fip7il 2024 to the 125 Plaintffi represented by Lawrence Nduttu, we informed them that ue hnd BEEN SERVED on their behalf with process in NAIROBI o 5 O

o COURT OF APPEAL CIWL APPEAL NO. EO69 OF 2024 LAI{IRENCE NDUTru A a a a o a a o OTHERS as. KENYA BREWERIES LIMITED 28. They acknou,ledged receipt of our said letter and promised to call on us on Apil 19tt' 2024 and on Apil22'a 2024. TheY did not. 29.In ligh 2024 LA WRENCE NDUTTU A OTHERS os. KENYA BREWERIES LIMITED tlwy did NOT utithdraur instructions from us or appointedANOTHER Adttocate to act in lieu of ourselaes in the said APPeal. 30,We appenred in the Court of Appeat for the heaing of the said appeal lodgedby the other group of persons claiming under Namada I Co. Adaocates on the 3RD Madr 2025 before the Hon. Iady Justice Achode, Mr. lustice Kiage and Mr. lustice loel Ngugi when the Appeal was withdraurn by thz said Laurence Nduttu. Enclosed is a copy of the Order therefrom. 31. How can we be blamed for this when Laurence Nduttu elected to chnnge adrtocates utithout the professional courtesy of informing us? We enclose a copy of tlw said Order. All said, we haae elaborately attempted to claify some issues germanc to the spuious allegations as ae haoe been made to respond to this issue 3 times now seParately, including urith the DCI, and the Adoocates Complaints Commission. With respect, these Complaints are leuied by only 4 or so isolnted persons because of their BITTERNESS af NOT pocketing the monies meant for their colleagues and the curtailing of the scheme to swindle their colleagues. Out of the 725 Plaintifs u,e represented in the span of the proceedings from the High Court to the Supreme C.ourt and bach we haae faithfully endeaoored to represent them professionally in the utay explicated abwe, rendeing frst class lcgal seraices at no fee. we shall be happy to receiae the Petition and respond to the same ASAP. Thnnk you. ncerelY,t , S KI ANJUr & CO. ADVOCATES a 6 a o I Attachments (Court Of Appeal Order I Sub ludice CTS posting in HCC 2792003) c.c. Choirmon, Lobour Relotions Committee Senote of Kenyo

o a a a IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NNROBI CORAM: KIAGE ACHODE & JOEL NGUGI JJ.A. CruIL APPEAL NO. EO69 OF 20.24 BETWEEN LAWRENCE NDUTU & 156 OTHERS APPELLANTS AND KENYA BREWERIES LIMITED RESPONDENT (An appeal agairst the ruIing and order of the High Court of Kenga at Milimani (Ongen" J.) dated 25th JulA 2023 in HCCC No. 279 oJ2Oo3) rt********************* ORDTR OF THE COURT This appeal was listed for hearing today. Mr. Anyona, learned counsel holding brief for Mr. Manwa for the appellants, now says that this appeal ought to be withdrawn, and prays that it be. Mr. Kahura, learned counsel for the respondents, is not objecting to such withdrawal and has been magnanimous enough to not insist on his costs. In t}.e circumstances, this appeal be and is thereby withdrawn with no order as to costs. Made at Nairobi this 3'd day of March 2o25. P. O. KIAGE JUDGE OF APPEAL L. ACHODE JUDGE OF APPEAL JOEL NGUGI a a a \) -4 liai ili-s I certifA t lsa 1 True copyoJ tlqglsrrg .a tt^^. I , _ 7 JUDGE OF APPEAL a , o o I I \ v

ffllglgge U se rs (https :i1e[[ng. cou rt. go. ke/a uth p!]Uldggrc) Law Firms !.J. HARRtsoN KtNYANJUI & COMPANYADVOCATES (h[pfl2eliling.court.go.ke/auth pfrblis'uple]C iseoso!) I Looout (httos://efilino.court. go.ke/auth/logout) El 0 -tnttp.'Aeflng.court.go.ke/auth-pJ-blclrresseges) THE JUDICIARY 1J ust icc 6c tt u r.\[r ie ff, a ud,Dcfc u c{c r Tracking Number: BJKA2003 Case Number: HCCCl279l2003 Citation: LAWRENCE NDUTU & OTHERS VS KENYA BREWERIES LTD & ANOTHER Public lnformation Kiosk (https:ly'ellllg.court.go.ke/kiosks) Case Activities Activity Date Court Room Actioned To 06 May 2025 RRI COURT 17 Hon. Mr. Justice Prof. (Dr.)Sifuna Nixon a-Vali!a3e/Scelqh- Outcomes 0o ,,1) r14. ,L"l,.i:t, t.' 0 Documents NO. Activity 1 Hearing o a o o o o a a a l. rta Case Summary Parties Case Activities Lodging Request Court Decisions Case Fees Receip-t9 a a

NO. Activity 2 Mention lVention 4 Mention ^ Mention Activity Date Court Room 23 Apr 2025 Actioned To Hon. Eric Otieno Wambo-PM Hon. Eric Otieno Wambo-PM Hon. Eric Otieno Wambo-PM Hon. Eric Otieno Wambo-PM Not Defined Hon. Eric Otieno Wambo-PM Outcomes Mention date set (in court) Directions given Directions given Mention date set (in court) B- Chamber 129 - First Floor Chamber 129 - First Floor Chamber 129 - First Floor Chambel129 - First Floor Chamber 129 - First Floor b lssuance of Orders & Decrees 23 Apr 2025 17 Mar 2025 17 Mar 2025 11 Mar 2025 Not Defined 11 Mar 2025 ORDER SIGNED 7 Mention mention ,i o o a ao o o a a aa

NO. Activity B Mention rescheduled lo 101312025 Dale I Mention MENTION '10 Mention MENTION 11 Mention Date for compliance 12 Mention lssuance of Orders & Decrees o Activity Date Court Room '10 Mar 2025 RRICOURT 17 Actioned To Hon. Mr. Justice Prof. (Dr.) Sifuna Nixon Hon. Eric Otieno Wambo-PM Hon. Eric Otieno Wambo-PM Hon. Mr. Justice Prof. (Dr.) Sifuna Nixon Hon. Eric Otieno Wambo-PM Hon. Eric Otieno Wambo-PM C) 11 Feb 2025 27 Jan2025 RRICOURT 17 13 Feb 2025 19 Dec 2024 17 Dec2024 Chamber 129 - First Floor Chamber 129 - First Floor Chamber 129 - First Floor Chamber 129 - First Floor o Mention date set (in court) Mention date set (in court) Directions given Directions given Directions given a o a O 13 O O o a a Outcomes Adjournment Court on Leave

NO. Activity N4ENTION DATE GIVEN 14. Activity Date Court Room 13 Dec 2024 CHAMBER 129 09 Dec2024 RRl3 21Nov 2024 RRl3 07 Nov 2024 RRl3 02 Ocl2024 Actioned To Hon. Silvia Motari Hon. Lady Justice Ouya Tabitha Wanyama Hon. Lady Justice Ouya Tabitha Wanyama Hon. Lady Justice Ouya Tabitha Wanyama Hon. Lady Justice Ouya Tabitha Wanyama Outcomes Directions given Mention date set (in court) Mention date set (in court) Mention date set (ln court) Not Certilied Urgent lssuance of Orders & Decrees Mention Date for compliance Certificate of urgency wrong input 15 16. Mention 17. Directions 18. I a ao o aa RRI3 o o a aa

NO. Activity Activity Date Court Room Aclioned To Outcomes THIS MATTER coming up on 4th October 2024 for directions on the Notice of Motion dated 1st October 2024 belore Honourable Justice T. W. Ouya UPON HEARING the Counsel for the Applicant ; lT lS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. THAT Matter NOT certified urgent 2. THAT Applicant to serve the Respondent within 7 days from the date hereof 3.That parties to appear before court for directions on 7th November 2024 GIVEN under my hand and seal of the Honourable court on this 4th October 2024 N a a 19. Notice of Motion 25 Jul2023 RRICOURT 19 PROCEEDINGS TO BE TYPED 20 Certificate of urgency 12 Jun 2023 RRICOURT 19 N/A 21 Mention 26 May 2023 RRI COURT 19 CASE CLOSED 22 Mention 26 Apr 2023 RRI COURT 19 for directions Notice of Motion 29 Mar 2O23 RRICOURT 19 Lady Justice Asenath Ongeri Lady Justice Asenath Ongeri Lady Justice Asenath Ongeri Lady Justice Asenath Ongeri Lady Justice Asenath Ongeri Ruling delivered- case closed Hearing date set (in court) Directions given Mention date set (in court) Mention date set (in court) 23 o o a o o a a a a

NO. ActivitY N/A 24. Mention 25 Mention 26 tvle ntion 27 lvlention 28 Mention 29 Activity Date Court Room 07 Mar 2023 Courtroom 30 26 Jan 2023 COURTROOM 2 3RD FLOOR 0B Nov 2022 Not Defined 03 Nov 2022 Not Defined 25 Ocl2022 Not Defined 11Oct2022 RRI COURT 20 Actioned To Hon. Lady Justice C. Meoli Hon. Lady Justice Janet Mulwa Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Hon. Justice Jesse Nyagah Outcomes Hearing date set (in court) Mention date set (in court) Court on Leave Mention date set (in court) Adjournment Court on Official DutY Adjournment Court not sitting Mention date set (in court) J\ a aa Mention a ao o a a aa

NO. Activity Activity Date Court Room 30 Mention 26Sep2022 RRICOURT20 31 Certificate of urgency 25 Jul2022 Courtroom 30 hearing on 261912022 before Hon sergon j 32 Mention 19 Jul2022 RRI COURT 20 33 Notice of l\4otion 29 Jun 2022 34 Notice of Motion 26 May 2022 Not Defined 35 Notice of Motion 26 May 2022 Not Defined Notice of Motion 2S lt{ar 2022 Not Defined Actioned To Hon. Justice Jesse Nyagah Hon. Lady Justice C. tvleoli Hon. Justice Jesse Nyagah Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Outcomes Adjournment Court not sitting Directions given Mention date set (in court) Mention date set (in court) Adjournment Court not sitting Hearing date set (in court) * o a o O a 36 a o O o a Not Defined o Not Defined

NO. Activity Activity Date Court Room 07 Feb 2022 Not Defined 25 Jun 2021 Not Defined 24 May 2021 Not Defined 10May2021 Not Defined 15Apr2021 Not Deflned 22 Jan 2021 Not Defined 15 Oct 2020 Not Defined Actioned To Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Outcomes Certified urgent Ruling delivered Ruling date given Mention date set (in court) Mention date set (in court) Directions given Adjournment Court not sitting s 37. 38. Ruling 39 Mention 40 Mention 41. Mention Certificate of urgency Certificate of urgency 42. 43. Mention oo o aa o o a a oa

NO. Activity Activity Date Court Room 44 Notice of Motion 02Mar 2020 Not Defined 45 Notice of Motion '18 Feb 2020 Not Defined 46 Notice of Motion 05 Nov 2019 Not Defined 47. Hearing of Applications 48 Ruling 26 Feb 2019 Not Deflned 49 Highlighting of Submissions 19 Dec 2018 Not Defined 03 Oct 2019 Not Defined 20 Dec 20'18 Not Defined Actioned To Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Outcomes Adjournment Court not sitting Adjournment Court not sitting Hearing date set (at the registry) Hearing date set (in court) Ruling delivered- case closed Ruling date given Adjournment Submission not ready --b O o 50. Mention O a o o o Not Defined O o o o

NO. ActivitY 51. Directions 52. lvlention 53 N,ile ntio n 54 Mention 55 lvlention 56 Mention 57 Mention Activity Date Court Room 05 Dec 2018 Not Defined 19 Nov 2018 Not Defined 08 Oct 2018 Not Defined 19 Sep 2018 Not Defined 26 Jul2018 Not Defined 24 Jul2018 Not Defined 18 Jul20'18 Not Defined 10 Jul2018 Not Defined Actioned To Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Outcomes .,-J- t__l o 58 a Mention o ao a o a o OO

NO. ActivitY 59 Mention 60 Mention 61 Mention 62 Mention 63. Hearing 64 Mention 65 Mention 66. Hearing Activity Date Court Room 27 Jun2018 Not Defined 26 Apr 2018 Not Defined 20 Mar 2018 Not Defined 09 Nov 2017 Not Defined 24 Oct2O17 Not Defined 11 Oct 2017 Not Defined 19 Sep 2017 Not Defined 11 Jul2017 Not Defined Actioned To Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Outcomes Mention date set (in court) s O o a o a o o o a o a

NO. Activity 67. Hearing 68 Mention 69. Hearing 70. Mention 71. Activity Date Court Room 10 Jul2017 Not Defined 15 Jun 20'17 Not Defined 27 Apr 2017 Not Defined 26 Apr 2017 Not Defined 22 Feb 2017 Not Defined 21 Feb 2017 Not Defined 20 Feb 2017 Not Defined 22 Nov 20'16 Not Defined Actioned To Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Not Defined Outcomes 6.\ 72. 73 Part Heard Hearing Part Heard Hearing Part Heard Hearing 74. Hearing o a a o a O o o a O a

NO. Activity 75 Mention Activity Date Court Room 25May 2016 Not Defined Actioned To Not Defined C. \ o a a o o a a o Outcomes O o a